Saturday, July 11, 2009
The Uniqueness of Personhood
One of the quintessential undertakings of philosophy is to define the essence of personhood. What, exactly, is it that makes me me? In a conversation over the past week, the idea was posed that I may be nothing more than my genetic makeup coupled with my lifetime of experiences - essentially, there is nothing more to man than nature and nurture. A place deep-seated within me, rebelled at the idea that there is no essence, no soul, no intentional uniqueness about me. I abhor the thought that were my genetic composition to be coupled with a precise replication of the entirety of my life's experience the result would be a direct clone of me in every aspect. The logic is sound by empirical standards, and yet I am compelled to insist upon a reality that is empirically imperceptible. I mean only that there exits an element of life that cannot be detected by present methods yet surely is real in the deepest sense of the word. I am troubled that my confidence is outside the bounds of rationalism - my epistemology is, consequently, inconsistent.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
In the deserts of africa where masses of people are slowly starving, living out the exact same existence from birth to death from generation to generation, there is still indubitably individual identity from one to another. Yes it is influenced by internal and external factors, but it is the make up of your concious decision making process that i believe really identifies you as an individual.
Not really trying to give a difinitive answer here, just stumbled upon this blog and thought I'd stick my nose in.
Post a Comment