I feel less confident in my answers.
It seems, these days, that I have difficulty fathoming any explanation of God that requires Him to be more than a concept, a theological problem to be worked over throughout the course of human history. Naturally, I believe that there must be some better experience to be had, some validating event in life that would lead rational, intelligent men and women to cling to the promise of a transcendent, personal God. Surely, they can't all be victims of a common delusion?
I find that troubling questions are raised: have these individuals coerced themselves into "experiencing" what they thought must be true of God? Where did the idea of a personal God originate? Who was the first to propagate this concept and to establish it as the criteria by which one's eternal destiny ought to be judged? I believe in God - the teleological arguments have done it for me. Beyond that, I am hard pressed to express conviction in any other element of Christianity. I am wary, because I want it to be real. I desire that the Bible be true. I wonder, though, if that very longing will become a self-fulfilling prophecy of sorts. I suspect that one day I will discover that I cannot cling to reason and faith with equal tenacity. As much as I want to reconcile the two I find that I do not possess the mental acuity to render them mutually inclusive.